After all fees are paid to the holders, why is AERO still weighed down b
Original headline费用全给持有人之后,AERO 为何仍被增发拖累?
Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.
Aerodrome, the leading DEX on Base by volume, merged with Velodrome effective October 22, 2026, to form the Aero brand operating across seven chains, and a new analysis argues the token remains weighed down by emissions despite its generous fee distribution. Over the past twelve months, Aero passed 70.6% of fees to locked voters ($86.9M) versus Uniswap's 6.3% ($58.8M), yet the old system minted roughly $19.6M more in AERO than it returned in fees and bribes—annualizing to an $80M–$105M gap at October's pace once one-time pool bribes are excluded. Under the merged system, rewards are dollar-denominated with a 1.2x cap on predicted pool revenue, implying holders recoup about $0.83 per $1.00 of AERO emitted—better than the prior $0.52 but still dilutive by design. Day-one migration was clean on positions (81.6% of veAERO voting weight converted, 6,654 sAERO positions allocated) but soft on liquidity (TVL 8.4% below expected, volume at 55% of pre-merge baseline, 37% outflow from legacy pools). Aero holds 53.6% of Base DEX volume versus Uniswap's 27.1%, though Uniswap earns 2.7x more fees per dollar of volume (25.5 bps vs 9.5 bps). Watch whether the revenue-linked reward cap converts a dilution-funded distribution into one backed by actual customer revenue, and whether liquidity and volume recover to pre-merge levels.
Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TechFlow's report and translated it from Chinese. It can get details wrong, so check the source.
Named in this story
Aerodrome, AERO, Base, Velodrome, Uniswap (UNI)
A linked name opens that asset's sentiment page.