15% of Perplexity Shopping responses contain risky sites
Original headline15% 퍼플렉시티 쇼핑 답변에 위험 사이트 등장
Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.
Perplexity’s shopping answers surfaced risky websites in 15% of responses, compared with 8% for ChatGPT and 4% for Gemini, according to a Podqi study reported by The Verge. Podqi queried three chatbots across 151 brands in two rounds in September, collecting 6,795 answers about where to buy products and whether international shipping was available. The risky sites included fake storefronts impersonating brands, counterfeit sellers, third-party re-registrations of former brand domains, and inactive sites. The metric reflects how often dangerous sites appeared in answers, not the share of purchases that went wrong. The findings matter as AI assistants increasingly mediate product discovery and referral traffic, putting brand safety and merchant verification under scrutiny. What to watch next is whether chatbot operators tighten source vetting and domain checks for shopping responses.
Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TokenPost's report and translated it from Korean. It can get details wrong, so check the source.
Named in this story
Perplexity, Gemini, ChatGPT, Podqi, The Verge