Story

On air. The free wire runs 15 minutes behind live. See pricing

World, crypto, finance and tech news, scored for impact.

CryptoTechFlowChinese, translatedFiled 2 days ago

Legal institutions ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the criteria for determining investment contracts.

Original headline法律机构请求美国最高法院审查投资合同认定标准

Open the sourceReported by TechFlow, techflowpost.com, 12 November 2026

Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.

The Investor Choice Advocates Network and law firm Paul Hastings have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify the test for what constitutes an investment contract, filing on behalf of three sales agents. The petition asks whether pre-sale asset selection, evaluation and pricing alone can make an asset a security, or whether buyers must expect profits from post-sale management by others. ICAN says federal circuit courts are split on the question, which could affect how securities law applies to digital assets, art and precious metals. The filing was disclosed on November 10, and the Supreme Court has not yet decided whether to take the case. The outcome could reshape how tokens and other assets are classified under U.S. securities law, with the Court's certiorari decision the next thing to watch.

Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TechFlow's report and translated it from Chinese. It can get details wrong, so check the source.

Named in this story

Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN), US Supreme Court, Paul Hastings