Evaluation of 4 Ethereum apps… Only Tornado Cash rated good in all four categories
Original headline이더리움 앱 4종 평가…토네이도캐시만 네 항목 양호
Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.
A new CROPS guide evaluating four Ethereum-based protocols found that only Tornado Cash rated "good" across all four criteria—censorship resistance, open source, privacy, and security—while Uniswap V2/V3 and Safe earned "good" marks on censorship resistance, open source, and security but fell short on privacy. The first edition's assessment date is October 28, 2026, and Bankless disclosed the guide five days ago. The framework, whose acronym stands for Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security, examines how each protocol actually operates and how much it depends on operators, with ratings split into "good," "moderate," and "poor." Projects scoring "poor" in any single category are excluded from the guide entirely. The results matter because they give DeFi users a structured, repeatable benchmark for judging how credibly neutral and resilient Ethereum applications really are. What to watch next is whether later editions expand beyond these four protocols and whether Uniswap and Safe address the privacy gap that kept them from a clean sweep.
Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TokenPost's report and translated it from Korean. It can get details wrong, so check the source.
Named in this story
Tornado Cash, Safe, Uniswap V2, Uniswap V3, Bankless