Is no one truly in need of blockchain? When financial infrastructure is reduced to plumbing, where does the crypto narrative go?
Original headline没有人在真正需要区块链?当金融基建沦为管道,加密叙事路在何方
Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.
The U.S. CFTC approved single-stock perpetual futures, and Kalshi launched live equity perps trading the same day, yet the product runs entirely on Kalshi's proprietary off-chain matching engine and CFTC-registered clearinghouse Kalshi Klear, with blockchain used only for stablecoin deposits and withdrawals and tokenized positions accessible via Solana platforms DFlow and Jupiter. The episode illustrates a broader "pipeline" problem: the crypto sectors showing real growth in 2026—prediction markets, perps, memecoins, stablecoins, RWA and on-chain vaults—use blockchains mainly as settlement rails rather than as the core business logic, while native DeFi languishes. Even Polymarket's U.S. version under CFTC oversight has little technical blockchain linkage, despite its Polygon and UMA origins. The article argues value is accruing to front-end distribution platforms that own user relationships, not to chains or token economies, mirroring the "Commanding Heights" thesis that value pools where technology is distributed rather than where it originates. What to watch next is whether crypto can produce native applications that make the blockchain indispensable rather than a mere pipe.
Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TechFlow's report and translated it from Chinese. It can get details wrong, so check the source.
Named in this story
Kalshi, Polymarket, CFTC, Hyperliquid (HYPE), Solana (SOL), John Wang
A linked name opens that asset's sentiment page.