Interpretations of the Bolt Securities Act diverge… CCI and Abelabs differ on Morpho's side
Original headline볼트 증권법 해석 갈려…모포 측 CCI·에이브랩스 이견
Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.
Aave Labs, Kamino Foundation, and Veda Tech Labs submitted a legal analysis to the SEC on October 26 arguing that decentralized lending protocols and non-custodial vaults should not automatically fall under U.S. securities law, while the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) filed a competing "Under Control" report on October 29 taking a different interpretive stance. The dispute centers on how much control a curator exercises over asset allocation and user returns after deposits, a factor that could determine whether a vault qualifies as a security. The split matters because it leaves unresolved how broadly U.S. securities rules apply to DeFi vault products at a time when regulators are weighing framework guidance for the sector. What to watch next is whether the SEC signals which interpretation it favors, and whether other DeFi protocols and vault curators line up behind either the Aave-led group or the CCI position.
Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TokenPost's report and translated it from Korean. It can get details wrong, so check the source.
Named in this story
Aave Labs, Crypto Council for Innovation, Kamino Foundation, Veda Tech Labs, SEC, Morpho (MORPHO)
A linked name opens that asset's sentiment page.