Story

On air. The free wire runs 15 minutes behind live. See pricing

World, crypto, finance and tech news, scored for impact.

EthereumTechFlowChinese, translatedFiled 16 h ago

Personally piercing the "burn deflation" narrative, Vitalik begins to change the anchor for ETH's valuation logic.

Original headline亲手刺破“燃烧通缩”叙事,Vitalik 开始给 ETH 的估值逻辑换锚

Open the sourceReported by TechFlow, techflowpost.com, 9 November 2026

Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.

Vitalik Buterin on November 8 publicly dismantled Ethereum’s long-held “burn-to-deflation” valuation thesis, arguing that fee burning never truly justified ETH’s roughly $272 billion market cap. He noted that sustaining that valuation at a 4% discount rate would require about 4.89 million ETH burned annually, yet only 2,694 ETH (around $6 million) was burned in the past 30 days, versus 1.48 million ETH in 2022 and just 19,200 ETH so far in 2026, as Layer 2 networks siphon mainnet activity. Rather than turn Ethereum into a profit-maximizing company like L’Oreal—which would require roughly 700,000 ETH per year in protocol-level funding and higher gas fees—Buterin chose to preserve decentralization and censorship resistance. He reframed ETH’s value anchor from a cash-flow-generating asset to a store of value (SoV) grounded in CROPS properties: censorship and capture resistance, open source, privacy, and security. The shift amounts to expectation management for a Rollup-centric roadmap where mainnet fee revenue is structurally declining, and it sets up a repricing debate over whether ETH can hold a digital-gold-style premium without burn-driven scarcity.

Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TechFlow's report and translated it from Chinese. It can get details wrong, so check the source.

Named in this story

Ethereum (ETH), ETH (ETH), Vitalik Buterin, L'Oreal, Yuga Labs

A linked name opens that asset's sentiment page.