Story

On air. The free wire runs 15 minutes behind live. See pricing

World, crypto, finance and tech news, scored for impact.

CryptoTokenPostKorean, translatedFiled 4 days ago

China's mining machine exports, review of Article 44 in determining the basis for smuggling charges

Original headline중국 채굴기 수출, 밀수죄 근거 판단에 제44조 검토

Open the sourceReported by TokenPost, tokenpost.kr, 8 November 2026, by 이도현

Not investment advice. Muhabbit scores how much a story may matter, not which way to trade.

A Chinese legal analysis has concluded that exporting cryptocurrency mining rigs from China does not automatically constitute smuggling of prohibited goods, with lawyer Shao Shiwei arguing that mining rigs are not classified as state-banned exports absent an explicit prohibition. The analysis distinguishes restrictions on mining activity itself from rules governing the physical export of equipment, finding that domestic limits on mining or rig sales do not by themselves designate the hardware as a banned export item. The question matters because Chinese miners and manufacturers have relocated rigs and operations abroad on a large scale, and the legal status of those shipments underpins export-driven revenue for major hardware makers. The analysis centers on whether Article 44 of the relevant customs or foreign trade rules provides the basis for treating rig exports as prohibited. What to watch next is whether Chinese customs authorities and courts adopt this interpretation in pending disputes, which would clarify the exposure of rig exporters to smuggling penalties.

Muhabbit's AI wrote this summary in its own words from TokenPost's report and translated it from Korean. It can get details wrong, so check the source.

Named in this story

China, Shao Shiwei